A worthwhile analysis appears at: http://www.alternativeinsight.com/New_York_Times_Plots_2016_Election.html

LikeLike

]]>LikeLike

]]>One possible defense of this GHG loop is that USCRN and SURFRAD data actually measure and thereby prove the existence of this up/down/”back” LWIR energy loop. Although in many instances the net 333 W/m^2 of up/down/”back” LWIR power flux loop exceeds by over twice the downwelling solar power flux, a rather obvious violation of conservation of energy.

And just why is that?

Per Apogee SI-100 series radiometer Owner’s Manual page 15. “Although the ε (emissivity) of a fully closed plant canopy can be 0.98-0.99, the lower ε of soils and other surfaces can result in substantial errors if ε effects are not accounted for.”

Emissivity, ε, is the ratio of the actual radiation from a surface and the maximum S-B BB radiation at the surface’s temperature. Consider an example from the K-T diagram: 63 W/m^2 / 396 W/m^2 = 0.16 = ε. In fact, 63 W/m^2 & 289 K & 0.16 together fit just fine in a GB version of the S-B equation.

What no longer fits is the 330 W/m^2 GHG loop which vanishes back into the mathematical thin air from whence it came.

“Their staff is too long. They are digging in the wrong place.”

“There is no spoon.”

And

The up/down/”back” GHG radiation of RGHE theory simply:

Does

Not

Exist.

Which also explains why the scientific justification of RGHE is so contentious.

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6384689028054212608

LikeLike

]]>Dan Holton

iPhone

>

LikeLike

]]>LikeLike

]]>LikeLike

]]>LikeLike

]]>LikeLike

]]>LikeLike

]]>